Never mind the "errors of Romanism", Anglicanism is itself an error itself and made many more - like the so-called "King James Bible".
All of Christianity is an error.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor male prostitutes nor homosexual offenders .........will inherit the kingdom of God.
From Paul's "Letter to the Corinthians".
An extract from a book often called "The Bible" which is for some reason one of the bases of current human culture!
I quote it here to point out its intolerance.
The "King James Bible" impossibly translates "homosexual offenders" as "effeminates".
Perhaps an attempt to soften the language.
King James VI of Scotland and I of England was reputedly and notoriously himself an homosexual.
Or in other more disgraceful and less tolerant words - those of the Bible - "an homosexual offender".
He was one of the first Protestant monarchs in European history, and hence had no Pope of anywhere to boss him around. Power corrupted him too!
So one thing I am saying that replacing the Pope with a monarch is worse than the Pope being head of a church.
All of Christianity is an error.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor male prostitutes nor homosexual offenders .........will inherit the kingdom of God.
From Paul's "Letter to the Corinthians".
An extract from a book often called "The Bible" which is for some reason one of the bases of current human culture!
I quote it here to point out its intolerance.
The "King James Bible" impossibly translates "homosexual offenders" as "effeminates".
Perhaps an attempt to soften the language.
King James VI of Scotland and I of England was reputedly and notoriously himself an homosexual.
Or in other more disgraceful and less tolerant words - those of the Bible - "an homosexual offender".
He was one of the first Protestant monarchs in European history, and hence had no Pope of anywhere to boss him around. Power corrupted him too!
So one thing I am saying that replacing the Pope with a monarch is worse than the Pope being head of a church.